Metatarsal, England and Rooney.

The metatarsal curse has struck again. With only 6 weeks away from the opening fixture of the world cup, English boy wonder Wayne Rooney broke a bone in his foot after a hard challenge from Paulo Ferreira in the crunch tie between the Premierships' top 2 sides last weekend. It is looking increasingly improbable that Rooney will be fit enough for the World Cup. David Beckham, Steven Gerrard, Gary Neville and more recently Michael Owen have suffered similar injuries. Beckham almost missed a World Cup, while both Gerrard and Neville missed the trip to WC2002. Jinx? Maybe.
The media reports following Rooney's injury were not surprising. Despair, ill luck, and perhaps England's best chance of success of late gone to smoke.
However, I was actually quite appalled when Steven Gerrard actually grieved on air and went on to announce that without Rooney, England will have no chance of success at the World Cup. Surely, England is not a one man show. There is no question that Rooney is a fantastic talent but to write off their own chance of success even before a ball is kicked is just absolutely shameful and ballistic.
While the vast majority of fans rant about the setback(some to the extent of tearing off their betting slips for England), I beg to differ.
Rooney's absence is a setback but it definitely does not spell the end of the world. There is abundant talent that can be called upon to replace the wonder kid. Not directly( I doubt anyone can), but fit in another custom formation that thrives on the absence of Rooney. Allow me to explain.

Michael Carrick is by far one of the more consistent holding midfielders in the country. Gerrard and Lampard are brilliant going forward. In the past, playing both Stevie G and Frankie Lampard in the same team raised questions of the dynamics and balance of the central midfield. More often than not, both players' natural instinct of moving forward left gaps in midfield. Now, with Rooney out, Carrick could come in and sit in front of the defence, like he has done so well for Spurs this season, and allow either Gerrard or Lampard the license to move upfront, playing off the lone striker(which in this case, Peter Crouch fits the target man bill perfectly.).
Why Crouch? He doesn't score many goals, but as a target man, he keeps the ball well, and allows time for the mid fielders to push forward in support. With Becks on the right, crosses will be in abundance and the near 2m tall Crouch can only benefit.
There is also the added option of playing Joe Cole just behind the lone striker, but that re-creates the left wing problem. Or reverting to a straight swap between strikers. Either Owen, Defoe or Bent could fit alongside beanpole.
So it's far from the end. Just look back in history 1966 and refer to the injury suffered by then prolific striker Jimmy Greaves and how his replacement Geoff Hurst stepped up and played a crucial role in England winning their first ever world cup.
Even without Rooney, England certainly still do have ample players that can come in and do a good job. If ever, there was a reason for England not winning the cup, trust me it's not because of Rooney's absence.(First name Sven).For now, I won't get into that.
Img sources: Google images, soccernet.com











